Just wondering

[TonyN]

I've 'Harriered' a model down with low airspeed before.

Didn't she mind?

[MWS]

The size of the plane or its wings is wholly irrelevant. All the matters is whether it's drive goes through the wheels. Since no plane has drive through the wheels...

I beg to differ..................

[Sancho]

The size of the plane or its wings is wholly irrelevant. All the matters is whether it's drive goes through the wheels (won't take off) or not (will take off precisely as normal). Since no plane has drive through the wheels...

It could be relevant in so much as (what I was trying to say above) assuming it's a plane that actually exists in real life (don't worry about the fictional converyor belt...), it being bigger or having bigger wings would probably imply that it was a more powerful plane and had more thrust, so the friction from the wheels (being the only backward force) would be proportionately less in comparison to the thrust. In short, the more poweful the plane the (even) less impetus there would be for it to go backwards or stand still.

[puddlesurfer]

Might be interested actually. How badly built though? Retrievable?

yes it's fixable - I'm at work at moment will send you a message later

[Albannach]

I beg to differ..................

If that drives via its wheels, how does it stay airbourne?