twopence worth.......
Well after driving around in my 2.4 SSR Ltd 1st generation for just over a year, I've just bought myself a beautiful 3rd gen 3.0 SSR-G, it cost 5 times the price of my 2.4 but having said that I've spent over $7000 on my 2.4!!!!
Probably the biggest differences I've noticed are:
Loads more performance on the 3, plus a massive improvement on fuel, my 2.4 gave about 430-460k's on a tank where my 3.0 is consistently returning over 500k's to a tank.
The 3.0 has more refinements but I'd agree that the seats are not as comfortable, although the cockpit is more user friendly and has an improved layout.
The 2.4 definitely looks harder but it also has a harder edge to it when driving, the 3.0 is much better on the road (off road has yet to be tested on the 3.0)
The digital compass is a plus as is the sunroof, it's nice to have all the other buttons to play with including that 'reversing mirror' but the biggest draw for me was the extra power!! Having said that, climate control is nice to have and saves endless fiddling with the heater on those cold days.
As for the tailgate, I actually prefer the top hinged variety on the 3.0 as it stops rain getting into the cargo bay when I'm out working on my buildings(currently building a stable/tack room) and gives me something to hide under at the same time, as far as loading goes, I've carried exactly the same in both trucks, just the 3.0 requires a couple of bits of string extra if I don't fancy poking things out the rear window(one to tie down tailgate, the other to secure spare wheel carrier) I do like the wheel carrier on the back as it provides a great advertinsing space courtesy of a sign-written tyre cover.
Yes the 3.0 is softer looking with a more modern urban 4x4 look to it but hen so are all late 90's on 4x4's unless your talking about the ute type 4x4's.
Well after driving around in my 2.4 SSR Ltd 1st generation for just over a year, I've just bought myself a beautiful 3rd gen 3.0 SSR-G, it cost 5 times the price of my 2.4 but having said that I've spent over $7000 on my 2.4!!!!
Probably the biggest differences I've noticed are:
Loads more performance on the 3, plus a massive improvement on fuel, my 2.4 gave about 430-460k's on a tank where my 3.0 is consistently returning over 500k's to a tank.
The 3.0 has more refinements but I'd agree that the seats are not as comfortable, although the cockpit is more user friendly and has an improved layout.
The 2.4 definitely looks harder but it also has a harder edge to it when driving, the 3.0 is much better on the road (off road has yet to be tested on the 3.0)
The digital compass is a plus as is the sunroof, it's nice to have all the other buttons to play with including that 'reversing mirror' but the biggest draw for me was the extra power!! Having said that, climate control is nice to have and saves endless fiddling with the heater on those cold days.
As for the tailgate, I actually prefer the top hinged variety on the 3.0 as it stops rain getting into the cargo bay when I'm out working on my buildings(currently building a stable/tack room) and gives me something to hide under at the same time, as far as loading goes, I've carried exactly the same in both trucks, just the 3.0 requires a couple of bits of string extra if I don't fancy poking things out the rear window(one to tie down tailgate, the other to secure spare wheel carrier) I do like the wheel carrier on the back as it provides a great advertinsing space courtesy of a sign-written tyre cover.
Yes the 3.0 is softer looking with a more modern urban 4x4 look to it but hen so are all late 90's on 4x4's unless your talking about the ute type 4x4's.
Comment