right ive took the 2" body lift off and put the orginal wheels back on and now its done 90kms on £15 so its getting better
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
12 mpg ?
Collapse
X
-
12mpg??
so 90 x .62 = 56miles £15 = 15ltrs ..15/4.54= 3.3 gallons 56 miles / 3.3 = roughly 17 miles to the gallon.. ive just put 25 quid in mine roughly half a tank and ill post my findings up when light comes on , most of my journeys are stop starts , ie school run total one and a half miles , to and from work one and a half miles so maybe this is not helping....... with fuel economy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tallyman View PostI think before you do anything else you should check for definite that your milometer is reading in Kilometers not miles. Find a stretch of road of a known length (say about 5 miles). Zero the trip meter then drive the route. If your milometer shows 5 then it's correct. If it shows around 8 then it's still reading in kilometers. As said, if you can get 310 miles out of a full tank then you are doing well, whereas 15-16 mpg is really crap unless it's a V6 petrol.Mine WAS a 150 bhp V6 and ran on PETROL
Comment
-
Originally posted by theraeteam View Postive just put 25 quid in mine roughly half a tank and ill post my findings up when light comes on...
We picked up the 3.0 in Poole, drove to Cairnryan (27mpg, motorway at 70mph), then drove around here a bit, let a couple of friends drive for a play (22mpg), then took a 150 mile trip on small roads, with a bit of other running around (24mpg). That's the only 3 fills so far. Reckon if we were doing long trips very carefully at 55mph we'd be able to push for 30mpg, but it'd be hard.Andy
http://www.surfingafrica.net
Comment
-
Originally posted by arron View Postthat must be a standard manual surf,,,mine is auto with 4in body lift and 33x12.5x15 kumho muds on,....Originally posted by kida4ever View Postright ive took the 2" body lift off and put the orginal wheels back on and now its done 90kms on £15 so its getting betterDo you know that, with a 50 character limit, it's
Comment
-
Originally posted by Albannach View PostOK, I'll ask. What the fuk has a body lift got to do with fuel consumption?
Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.
Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.
You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.
Which isn't very significant.Andy
http://www.surfingafrica.net
Comment
-
Originally posted by adpsimpson View PostAir resistance?
Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.
Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.
You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.
Which isn't very significant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arron View Postthanks i was just gonna say that lol,,,,Originally posted by adpsimpson View PostAir resistance?
Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.
Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.
You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.
Which isn't very significant.
Originally posted by kida4ever View Postive cured it ..............ive sold itBrian
Comment
Comment