yobit eobot.com

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

12 mpg ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    right ive took the 2" body lift off and put the orginal wheels back on and now its done 90kms on £15 so its getting better

    Comment


    • #17
      12mpg??

      so 90 x .62 = 56miles £15 = 15ltrs ..15/4.54= 3.3 gallons 56 miles / 3.3 = roughly 17 miles to the gallon.. ive just put 25 quid in mine roughly half a tank and ill post my findings up when light comes on , most of my journeys are stop starts , ie school run total one and a half miles , to and from work one and a half miles so maybe this is not helping....... with fuel economy

      Comment


      • #18
        they are the kind of trips iam makeing in it at the moment

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Tallyman View Post
          I think before you do anything else you should check for definite that your milometer is reading in Kilometers not miles. Find a stretch of road of a known length (say about 5 miles). Zero the trip meter then drive the route. If your milometer shows 5 then it's correct. If it shows around 8 then it's still reading in kilometers. As said, if you can get 310 miles out of a full tank then you are doing well, whereas 15-16 mpg is really crap unless it's a V6 petrol.
          Now you know why I boast about having the most powerful factory engine option........ got to make myself feel better somehow
          Mine WAS a 150 bhp V6 and ran on PETROL

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by theraeteam View Post
            ive just put 25 quid in mine roughly half a tank and ill post my findings up when light comes on...
            Half-filling will never give you anything more than a very rough idea. Need to fill to the brim, reset the trip counter, then whenever you feel like it fill to the brim again. The fuel in the second fill and the miles from the first fill are what to go on - you're replacing the fuel used to do those miles.

            We picked up the 3.0 in Poole, drove to Cairnryan (27mpg, motorway at 70mph), then drove around here a bit, let a couple of friends drive for a play (22mpg), then took a 150 mile trip on small roads, with a bit of other running around (24mpg). That's the only 3 fills so far. Reckon if we were doing long trips very carefully at 55mph we'd be able to push for 30mpg, but it'd be hard.
            Andy
            http://www.surfingafrica.net

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by arron View Post
              that must be a standard manual surf,,,mine is auto with 4in body lift and 33x12.5x15 kumho muds on,....
              Originally posted by kida4ever View Post
              right ive took the 2" body lift off and put the orginal wheels back on and now its done 90kms on £15 so its getting better
              OK, I'll ask. What the fuk has a body lift got to do with fuel consumption?
              Do you know that, with a 50 character limit, it's

              Comment


              • #22
                i'll let you know what my mpg is once the 39's are fitted but at the moment i get about 240 running around or about 280 on a decent journey and thats on 33's
                https://www.facebook.com/groups/henpals/

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Albannach View Post
                  OK, I'll ask. What the fuk has a body lift got to do with fuel consumption?
                  Air resistance?

                  Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.

                  Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.

                  You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.

                  Which isn't very significant.
                  Andy
                  http://www.surfingafrica.net

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by adpsimpson View Post
                    Air resistance?

                    Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.

                    Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.

                    You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.

                    Which isn't very significant.
                    thanks i was just gonna say that lol,,,,

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      yeh that helped loads ,all i know once returned to std with filters it doubled the mpg ,but removeing the 33s and the lift gave the biggist increase

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        mpg

                        out of my £25 or 25 liters i got 190 kms till light went on from half a tank full ,roughly... so 190*0.62=118 miles divide by 25= 4.7ltrs *4.54= 21.3mpg , thats all stop start journeys..

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          ive cured it ..............ive sold it

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by kida4ever View Post
                            ive cured it ..............ive sold it


                            I wonder how many more members are going to follow your advice for a cure!!




                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by arron View Post
                              thanks i was just gonna say that lol,,,,
                              Originally posted by adpsimpson View Post
                              Air resistance?

                              Drag = 0.5*density of air * V^2 * Area * Coeff.

                              Assuming coefficient of drag is 0.4, density is 1.2, a 4 inch lift changes frontal area from 2.95m^2 to 3.13m^2. At 67mph (30 m/s), that changes drag from 639N to 675N.

                              You'd need almost exactly 1kW to overcome that extra drag at that high speed. At half the speed, it's only 133W.

                              Which isn't very significant.
                              BULLSHIT

                              Originally posted by kida4ever View Post
                              ive cured it ..............ive sold it
                              Of course it was rotten on fuel it as a 2.4 you need to drive th your foot on the floor
                              Brian

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                i thought u were away the night?
                                私のホバークラフト は鰻が一杯です。

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X