Originally posted by John h
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Politics.....again
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sancho View PostNot quite right.
Labour get wind of the fact that Clegg and Cameron can't do a deal so tell Gordon to stand down as the last role of the dice. Clegg is now in a much stronger position with Cameron because he would be willing to team up with Labour so he can give Cameron a harder time. Cameron has to decide whether he's going to give in to Clegg.
Meanwhile Labour are on the phone to the SNP, Plaid, the Greens and a few weird Irish parties who all want the same thing trying to find enough support so that they would have a majority if the LibDems came to play.
Clegg will play both sides off against each other but neither wants to give him anything.
I'll probably end up with another election being called in a week's time or Cameron deciding to run a minority government.
The LibDems won't change the way we vote without recourse to the people - they were proposing a referendum on it, not an immediate change.
It reeks of nepotism...badly. JHust like the maastricht treaty, and the lisbon treaty...keep on voting till you get the result you want. And as for no one winning the election...true. But why should the two parties who came last and very last, govern.Last edited by gwh200; 10 May 2010, 20:44.Non intercooled nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sancho View PostAt lest you've got someone in charge. It's worse when there's no overall control and all they do is score points instead of making decisions.Death rides a Black Horse
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sancho View PostAny other suggestions?
The only thing they can do is a con/libdem alliance, they don't have to enjoy it, they dont have to get all their pet projects up and running on day one, but they do have to crack on and start getting us out of the mire. the rest can be sorted out later, with a bit of luck...it's in me shed, mate.
Comment
-
The problem is that LibDem are generally left of Labour these days. Personally, my preference would be for someone, anyone, to form a minority government and for all MPs to vote according to what they believe in, rather than the party line. That's what we actually elect them to do.
Comment
-
Re
Another election using proportional representation.
Party with the 'most' elected members govern.
Simples!
let's face it, we all want Brown out and are desperate for some small hope and changes.
I personally hate Labour for what they have done but I ain't a Tory or Lib Dem supporter!
I would rather have Father Dougal Maguire as prime minister, he couldn't possibly be as bad as Gordon The Liar!
Our politicians have generally proven themselves to be unworthy our votes over the past few years.
I trust none of them and I firmly believe that the are ALL in it for the money/power trip!
Britain is finished!
Soon we are gonna be known as the little island off the coast of europe where you can go to get welfare.
Previous applicants need not apply!Last edited by hellmett; 10 May 2010, 21:39.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sancho View PostWon't we all vote the same again?
I would expect a LOT more interest to be shown this time. There is one voting reform im in favour of (which i believe exists in australia), where if you are eligible,you are legally required to vote.
Voter apathy is the biggest winner here. Would we vote the same again...its the first time its happened in 30 years, perhaps this might spur the population on to exercise their vote in a different manner. We face a really big challenge, whoever wins, in getting the economy back on track. This prevarication is just the last thing this country needs right now...or indeed at any time.Non intercooled nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hellmett View PostAnother election using proportional representation.
Party with the most elected members govern.
Simples!
It would require either a boundary change again, or each mp being worth x amounts of votes per population, per area per mp voted in.Its a mega expensive change....just what britain needs right now, after the electoral commision quango costs billion anyway. And all this so a minority group grasps power.Last edited by gwh200; 10 May 2010, 21:38.Non intercooled nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gwh200 View Postin our current media driven times, the vast majority of people direct their love or loathing at the head of the party in power. He/she after all, becomes the prime minister. Their position, persona and personal standing is fundamental to a party being elected. Some bloke, who wasnt elected as the leader of a partry, but becomes one by default...go figure. The electorate feels cheated. And pr...how many snp mp's and how many labour...and who's the boss ?
Originally posted by Apache View PostI think its all hideous and an insult to the British people. I cant believe that two (or more, if Labour are to seize power) parties who DID NOT win an election can possibly end up running a country! It's just insane, and if we get PR (as Lib Dems want) we will have this ###### mess every time they need to make an important decision.
Unbelievable!
And the alternative? A government with insufficient majority to govern. To keep the wheels rolling somebody who did not win is essential
Brown, as far as I'm concerned is a ###### disgrace (always has been IMO) for dragging this out which is either a) he is totally deluded b) desperate to hang on to power at any cost. Thankfully the rest of his party have seen fit to stab him in the back for the sake of a last ditch grasp at power. They make me sick.
BogusСви можемо
Comment
Comment