It's arrived!
There is a reply from the GLASS rep in it to the letters about the incident on Strata Florida which just beggars belief. Roger Fairclough either is, or should be a politician as he doesn't answer questions, but rather poses new ones in response. What a ######!
Remember, this guy wasn't there and has gained the info something like 3rd hand.
In his initial letter he was moaning about there being one group of eleven vehicles. I corrected his misinformation and now he is 'maintaining that eleven vehicles is too many' even in two groups. Hang on... that's in their OWN rules!
Also, we didn't need to move the vehicles that were blocking the route because, apparently, GLASS say it's legal to drive round them. Oh yes, very helpful. I'd already told him in the last letter that the ground was very soft to the edges and breaking up due to the other two vehicles passing. Seems to save face, he'd rather we'd left the rusty heaps there, squeezed past, risking ripping out the undergrowth or rolling down the hill.
Seems he'd rather get his info from the mysterious bystander (who as far as I can tell, is a figment of his imagination, because there were no bystanders) than from people who were actually there.
I for one wont be renewing my GLASS membership if their public face represents their overall views, which seem to be 'do as we say because we are always right, you are always wrong'
There is a reply from the GLASS rep in it to the letters about the incident on Strata Florida which just beggars belief. Roger Fairclough either is, or should be a politician as he doesn't answer questions, but rather poses new ones in response. What a ######!
Remember, this guy wasn't there and has gained the info something like 3rd hand.
In his initial letter he was moaning about there being one group of eleven vehicles. I corrected his misinformation and now he is 'maintaining that eleven vehicles is too many' even in two groups. Hang on... that's in their OWN rules!
Also, we didn't need to move the vehicles that were blocking the route because, apparently, GLASS say it's legal to drive round them. Oh yes, very helpful. I'd already told him in the last letter that the ground was very soft to the edges and breaking up due to the other two vehicles passing. Seems to save face, he'd rather we'd left the rusty heaps there, squeezed past, risking ripping out the undergrowth or rolling down the hill.
Seems he'd rather get his info from the mysterious bystander (who as far as I can tell, is a figment of his imagination, because there were no bystanders) than from people who were actually there.
I for one wont be renewing my GLASS membership if their public face represents their overall views, which seem to be 'do as we say because we are always right, you are always wrong'
Comment