Rather than trying tenuous methods, send in another letter pointing out several facts.
1) You sent in a letter of appeal. The fact that they neither contacted you nor requested further information from yourself means that they have in no way or form reviewed the issuance of the ticket either: 1) at all or 2) in an unbiased manner. A review of appeal requires garnering all facts from both parties and reviewing, (in an unbiased manner), all of the information supplied.
2) You were not notified by the landlord or such that such a permit needed to be displayed. Whilst they were technically correct in the initial case of issuing the ticket, the fact that this has now been pointed out to them means that the ticket is both invalid, and that any further correspondence should be directed towards the lnadlord? to notify them off the fact that all tenants should be notified of this pre-requisite for using the provided parking facilities.
3) Also add a note that you expect them to start conducting themselves with the level of professionalism that their position and business requires, and that you expect a response notifying you of the fact that the charge has been dropped in an acceptable period of time, and not as and when, (or if), they see fit.
4) Also add that if they actually intend to start conducting themselves in a professional manner and reviewing things properly, you are quite willing to forward any information they require to review the issuance of the ticket.
5) Be polite. Forceful, curt, but polite. DO NOT use any derogatory comments or ill language. They will use it as an excuse.
If they then reply with the same tardiness in any way of form, merely inform them that you are no longer going to deal directly with someone who has no level of professionalism and/or understanding of the basic courtesy that their position warrants, and that you will be carrying out all further correspondence with your local M.P instead, and that you will also be forwarding to the M.P all relevant information and copies of all correspondence to date.
1) You sent in a letter of appeal. The fact that they neither contacted you nor requested further information from yourself means that they have in no way or form reviewed the issuance of the ticket either: 1) at all or 2) in an unbiased manner. A review of appeal requires garnering all facts from both parties and reviewing, (in an unbiased manner), all of the information supplied.
2) You were not notified by the landlord or such that such a permit needed to be displayed. Whilst they were technically correct in the initial case of issuing the ticket, the fact that this has now been pointed out to them means that the ticket is both invalid, and that any further correspondence should be directed towards the lnadlord? to notify them off the fact that all tenants should be notified of this pre-requisite for using the provided parking facilities.
3) Also add a note that you expect them to start conducting themselves with the level of professionalism that their position and business requires, and that you expect a response notifying you of the fact that the charge has been dropped in an acceptable period of time, and not as and when, (or if), they see fit.
4) Also add that if they actually intend to start conducting themselves in a professional manner and reviewing things properly, you are quite willing to forward any information they require to review the issuance of the ticket.
5) Be polite. Forceful, curt, but polite. DO NOT use any derogatory comments or ill language. They will use it as an excuse.
If they then reply with the same tardiness in any way of form, merely inform them that you are no longer going to deal directly with someone who has no level of professionalism and/or understanding of the basic courtesy that their position warrants, and that you will be carrying out all further correspondence with your local M.P instead, and that you will also be forwarding to the M.P all relevant information and copies of all correspondence to date.
Comment