Airplane on a Conveyor conundrum

[gwh200]

anyone else fancy a pop?

i love you dude
and i ran this past proffesor terry clark today,an eminent physicist who now lives in tromso.he said that it wouldnt take off , he told me to consider it in a linear term with no fixed reference,and do the maths,he then told me to bugger off as he was going out,i did the transformation and it was quite long winded,and as it turned out the no fly was right,but only theoretically

the rather ambiguous wording has thrown up the confusion,but,

(and priding meself on non biased science) the theory breaks at u=0
i can accept that the object will move forward,but...and its a big but
it does start to violate the potential energy law thingy(cant remember its name)

it was easier for me to grasp when i considered the problem in reverse

what happenswhen a plane lands on a moving conveyor,that runs backwards relative to the planes motion,consider the situation to be ideal,ie no friction etc and what happens....


oh and after tumble drying a load of towels one day,i cleaned the filter and it was like the biggest ball of belly button fluff you have ever seen,so i rolled it up,stuffed it into my belly button and went to show the wife !!


for some reason she wasn't impressed

[darkdezigns]

not going to happen mate, the wheels dont power a plane .

ok last try,if its on the belt the landing gear is down as per post 1,it's trying to take off,so it wud be,in this case it has no means of gaining lift,end of,no matter wot gwh and yosh say,and more to point can't believe u lot are this fcukin petty,was put up light hearted,now turned into an online playground,seriously makes me reconsider being here tbh

[yoshie]

I'm going to get muddy on Sat Drumclog here we come yeha

[darkdezigns]

[QUOTE=gwh200;405364]i love you dude
and i ran this past proffesor terry clark today,an eminent physicist who now lives in tromso.he said that it wouldnt take off , he told me to consider it in a linear term with no fixed reference,and do the maths,he then told me to bugger off as he was going out,i did the transformation and it was quite long winded,and as it turned out the no fly was right,but only theoretically

ty end of,u answered it all by yrself

[white akita]

the wheels and tyres would go from 0-400mph in a second and thats all !
in reply to gwh last post.

[yoshie]

i love you dude
and i ran this past proffesor terry clark today,an eminent physicist who now lives in tromso.he said that it wouldnt take off , he told me to consider it in a linear term with no fixed reference,and do the maths,he then told me to bugger off as he was going out,i did the transformation and it was quite long winded,and as it turned out the no fly was right,but only theoretically

the rather ambiguous wording has thrown up the confusion,but,

(and priding meself on non biased science) the theory breaks at u=0
i can accept that the object will move forward,but...and its a big but
it does start to violate the potential energy law thingy(cant remember its name)

it was easier for me to grasp when i considered the problem in reverse

what happenswhen a plane lands on a moving conveyor,that runs backwards relative to the planes motion,consider the situation to be ideal,ie no friction etc and what happens....


oh and after tumble drying a load of towels one day,i cleaned the filter and it was like the biggest ball of belly button fluff you have ever seen,so i rolled it up,stuffed it into my belly button and went to show the wife !!


for some reason she wasn't impressed

Then hit the go pedal and it will take off again the wheels are for braking and support not drive now I'm finished no more. I love you all so back to truck triva for me

[gwh200]

ok last try,if its on the belt the landing gear is down as per post 1,it's trying to take off,so it wud be,in this case it has no means of gaining lift,end of,no matter wot gwh and yosh say,and more to point can't believe u lot are this fcukin petty,was put up light hearted,now turned into an online playground,seriously makes me reconsider being here tbh

jeez lighten up a few watts dude ,

this has been one of the best threads ever,its had tears laughter..and all sorts,the disagreements the stand offs..its been quite aride,and thats what this place thrives on,a healthy debate,so pitch straight back in with a pi55 take ,and either sink or swim

makes me wonder whether or not i want to be here,online playground,,like i said dude,lighten some

[Albannach]

You want to be here; if you didn't, you wouldn't have to ask yourself...

[Apache]

If you are referring to light, then watts isn't enough (unless you are talking about power consumption of said light source).

If you are talking incident light, you need to specify area too, as in W/cm2.

[yoshie]

You want to be here; if you didn't, you wouldn't have to ask yourself...

I don't I want to be at Drumclog and so do you so get Sat off

[MudSurfer]

Is there a cuddly toy and a set of glasses and crystal cut decanter on the plane???

[gwh200]

If you are referring to light, then watts isn't enough (unless you are talking about power consumption of said light source).

If you are talking incident light, you need to specify area too, as in W/cm2.

just stop it now !!

[darkdezigns]

jeez lighten up a few watts dude ,

this has been one of the best threads ever,its had tears laughter..and all sorts,the disagreements the stand offs..its been quite aride,and thats what this place thrives on,a healthy debate,so pitch straight back in with a pi55 take ,and either sink or swim

makes me wonder whether or not i want to be here,online playground,,like i said dude,lighten some

go back a few pages to where i was called thick

[MudSurfer]

What if there was a conveyor belt on the plane, with another smaller plane on that one - which would take off first?

[Albannach]

I don't I want to be at Drumclog and so do you so get Sat off

Can't, and even if I could, I have the world's most annoyingly noisy diff. Should be getting a good one from supersurf tomorrow though