I'm in the process on getting a 1995 V6 model from Japan by auction and was informed that it would be better to get a vehilce that had already had the engine replaced at around 75,000 miles rather than go for something of similar price at around 55,000 miles due to the statistic that at every 65,000 miles the engine needs replacing. Does this make sense to anyone out there?
Answers appreciated as I need to make some decisions within the next day or so.
Steve
Answers appreciated as I need to make some decisions within the next day or so.
Steve
Comment