Originally posted by shokenore
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anti-roll bar linkage
Collapse
X
-
"B.A." Baracus: "Talk to me, talk sense so I can talk back. Not all this jibberjabber like breaking the peace and all that."
www.johnthebuilder.info
-
Originally posted by Wolfracer View PostNo idea, I leave it with the mechanic who replaces a boot or two then I collect it with a certificate. what happens in between I don't know...
If it was allowed I would be following him around seeing what he was poking and prodingEat.Sleep.Surf.Repeat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shokenore View PostMy paranoia would not allow that.
If it was allowed I would be following him around seeing what he was poking and proding"B.A." Baracus: "Talk to me, talk sense so I can talk back. Not all this jibberjabber like breaking the peace and all that."
www.johnthebuilder.info
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wolfracer View PostI know what you mean. I was like that with the Monaro... but the surf is more like letting thing the mrs go for a cervical smear. You know it's unpleasant, so best not to know the detail...:\
Originally posted by andy_enuff View PostIf you can afford to run a surf, you can afford drop links. Stop arguing about mts,, just get to know your tester personally if you can't afford drop links you have the wrong car...
As the description of the part that required attention is different than what the OP understood.Hence his need to ask here about some clarification.
Your comment on "if you can't afford drop links you have the wrong car",is false if the parts had failed on my Subaru or on a Skoda,or on a Seat they would still need to be replaced,regardless of costs.
The main thrust of the discussion was about the removal of the ARB on the basis that if it is not there the MOT tester can not fail it,however the OP would not be able to have the vehicle retested with the ARB removed.
The discussion also questioned if the ARB was removed before the test was conducted.At no point did the OP mention costs.
I see my MOT station once a year,they have four MOT testers,which one would you suggest I engaged in a relationship with?Eat.Sleep.Surf.Repeat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andy_enuff View PostIf you can afford to run a surf, you can afford drop links. Stop arguing about mts,, just get to know your tester personally if you can't afford drop links you have the wrong car...
As shokenore said, we were discussing the rules around arb being removed, if it were the case an urgent mot is needed and dont have time to wait for links, or if personal financial reasons dont allow you to buy them yet. They may be cheap enough but this dosent mean that if needed everyone can buy them straight away.well, that was a bad idea!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by shokenore View PostLOL what a lovely image you have created. That post most definitely does not need pics
The thread was concerning what parts the OP needed for his retest.
As the description of the part that required attention is different than what the OP understood.Hence his need to ask here about some clarification.
Your comment on "if you can't afford drop links you have the wrong car",is false if the parts had failed on my Subaru or on a Skoda,or on a Seat they would still need to be replaced,regardless of costs.
The main thrust of the discussion was about the removal of the ARB on the basis that if it is not there the MOT tester can not fail it,however the OP would not be able to have the vehicle retested with the ARB removed.
The discussion also questioned if the ARB was removed before the test was conducted.At no point did the OP mention costs.
I see my MOT station once a year,they have four MOT testers,which one would you suggest I engaged in a relationship with?
I'd go for the female one......
Comment
Comment