If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I heard that when (some of) these sites give you a trial account, with "Monopoly" money, newbies seem to do pretty good. Then you take the plunge with your own real money and get clobbered by perfect storms etc.
So they fix the odds on trial accounts, basically.
I play on cmc markets, at least those odds are the real feeds.
It's a simple pattern...You lose, next bet is double the original stake.
Keep on doubling up until you win.
The Martingale system is a really good system. Assuming that you have an almost infinite amount of money to bet, for incredibly small gains.
Even if there weren't betting ceilings (which there nearly always are), even a common run of 50/50 losses requires huge stakes very quickly.
Good explanation here...
My uncle used to race dogs at Wembley and Hendon (before Brent X)
My dad sometimes used the 'double up', but he said you had to go all the way, no bottling.
Probably why I have always been poor.
My uncle used to race dogs at Wembley and Hendon (before Brent X)
My dad sometimes used the 'double up', but he said you had to go all the way, no bottling.
Probably why I have always been poor.
Bet @ 1p would require a bet of over £160k after 25 and over £5million after 29 losing bets to break even.
Not with standing betting limits you also need a big bank role. That is why we work instead of just endlessly betting red or black and doubling up.
'O' and how likely are you to win on black after 20 reds have landed in a row?
Still a 50/50 bet so forget any daft notion of law of average being on your side.
Comment