Sorry it's not surf releated but I was impressed with the other legal thingie thread and would certainly appreciate any advise on the following.
I'm currently in dispute with my daughters ex nursery over fees. We withdrew her last year and gave 7 days notice but subsquently found out it was a months notice required or a months fees which they are pursuing. The were numerous reasons for taking her out and I regret not doing it sooner. The nursery claims they have a legal contract with us which was signed by my wife. I'm claiming they breached that contract when they failed in their duty of care to my daughter when a boy got access to a pair of scissors and cut chunks out of her hair. This was in a fully supervised room with cctv and i view it as more than normal biting/scratching. Unfortunatly this was last March and as I left my daughter in the nursery until Sept, the nursery are arguing I was obviously happy with them. It was the start of a few concerns which we are arguing backwards and forwards.
Today I recieved a letter from them and they claim that "duty of care is an aim, objective and expectation of the nursery but not a term and condition of the financial contract". Now I always thought I was paying for a service which included my daughters health and safety as a given. This means anything could happen on their premises and they would still expect payment however unhappy I am.
Has anyone experienced similar or can give any advise or pointers as this is becoming really annoying.
Thanks in advance
Ross
I'm currently in dispute with my daughters ex nursery over fees. We withdrew her last year and gave 7 days notice but subsquently found out it was a months notice required or a months fees which they are pursuing. The were numerous reasons for taking her out and I regret not doing it sooner. The nursery claims they have a legal contract with us which was signed by my wife. I'm claiming they breached that contract when they failed in their duty of care to my daughter when a boy got access to a pair of scissors and cut chunks out of her hair. This was in a fully supervised room with cctv and i view it as more than normal biting/scratching. Unfortunatly this was last March and as I left my daughter in the nursery until Sept, the nursery are arguing I was obviously happy with them. It was the start of a few concerns which we are arguing backwards and forwards.
Today I recieved a letter from them and they claim that "duty of care is an aim, objective and expectation of the nursery but not a term and condition of the financial contract". Now I always thought I was paying for a service which included my daughters health and safety as a given. This means anything could happen on their premises and they would still expect payment however unhappy I am.
Has anyone experienced similar or can give any advise or pointers as this is becoming really annoying.
Thanks in advance
Ross
Comment