If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The English English pedants can't compete with the internet, American English is winning around the world, everyone here is really only arguing over a fading dialect.
Nah, change is inevitable. I'm trying to work out what to say now, not what was said 100 years ago or what will be said in 100 years from now.
OK. Dependant on context, 'team' can be either plural or singular. I personally prefer singular, as in "Your team's (is) crap!". But I may use the plural now and again
How about explaining why Army, a squad, or team, is always singular?
Same answer really - usually the context in which "Army" is used is singular, as in the Army invaded.
But it can be used in the plural sense too as a reference to the soldiers in the army. "The Army are hard as nails, whereas the Air Force are soft"
(sorry all you crabs! )
I was busting my mule off at work before Christmas, with the tedious though probably inevitable result that I have been laid low with the flu over the whole of Christmas. Jessie too . Christmas lunch consisted of some defrosted spag bog brought round by a kindly neighbour...!
Pretty miserable, though coming out the other end thankfully now - just in time to get back to work
Hope you and Linda had a good break.
Last edited by flounderbout; 31 December 2010, 14:47.
OK. Dependant on context, 'team' can be either plural or singular. I personally prefer singular, as in "Your team's (is) crap!". But I may use the plural now and again
How about explaining why Army, a squad, or team, is always singular?
"A army is approaching from the West sir"
Not right is it?
Alan
yoshie "Didn't know they had a pill for laziness, anyway get well soon."
It is whether the noun starts with a vowel sound which dictates the use of "an" or "a", rather than whether it starts with a vowel per se. So for example many nouns starting with a "u", and all starting with "eu" are preceded by "a", not "an". Eunuch, European, unicorn, union etc. There are others - a ewe, a one-armed bandit etc.
The converse is also true although words starting with consonants which begin with vowel sounds are unusual. The only one that springs immediately to mind is an ylang-ylang tree, although there are doubtless others. It is quite common in abbreviations however - an L-shape, an SLR etc.
Confusion tends to arise with the aspirate "h". If the "h" is hard (as in hat), then "a" is obviously used. If the "h" is silent then "an" is used (honourable, hour). But "an" is also traditionally used if the stress is on the second syllable of an aspirated word such as hotel or historic.
That usage is increasingly uncommon. Personally I find "an hotel" and "an historic" rather an unnecessary affection, and I wouldn't and don't use it myself.
But then I go to great pains to ensure that I don't come across as some sort of pompous tawt. As you can tell from this post....
It is whether the noun starts with a vowel sound which dictates the use of "an" or "a", rather than whether it starts with a vowel per se. So for example many nouns starting with a "u", and all starting with "eu" are preceded by "a", not "an". Eunuch, European, unicorn, union etc. There are others - a ewe, a one-armed bandit etc.
The converse is also true although words starting with consonants which begin with vowel sounds are unusual. The only one that springs immediately to mind is an ylang-ylang tree, although there are doubtless others. It is quite common in abbreviations however - an L-shape, an SLR etc.
Confusion tends to arise with the aspirate "h". If the "h" is hard (as in hat), then "a" is obviously used. If the "h" is silent then "an" is used (honourable, hour). But "an" is also traditionally used if the stress is on the second syllable of an aspirated word such as hotel or historic.
That usage is increasingly uncommon. Personally I find "an hotel" and "an historic" rather an unnecessary affection, and I wouldn't and don't use it myself.
But then I go to great pains to ensure that I don't come across as some sort of pompous tawt. As you can tell from this post....
It is whether the noun starts with a vowel sound which dictates the use of "an" or "a", rather than whether it starts with a vowel per se. So for example many nouns starting with a "u", and all starting with "eu" are preceded by "a", not "an". Eunuch, European, unicorn, union etc. There are others - a ewe, a one-armed bandit etc.
The converse is also true although words starting with consonants which begin with vowel sounds are unusual. The only one that springs immediately to mind is an ylang-ylang tree, although there are doubtless others. It is quite common in abbreviations however - an L-shape, an SLR etc.
Confusion tends to arise with the aspirate "h". If the "h" is hard (as in hat), then "a" is obviously used. If the "h" is silent then "an" is used (honourable, hour). But "an" is also traditionally used if the stress is on the second syllable of an aspirated word such as hotel or historic.
That usage is increasingly uncommon. Personally I find "an hotel" and "an historic" rather an unnecessary affection, and I wouldn't and don't use it myself.
But then I go to great pains to ensure that I don't come across as some sort of pompous tawt. As you can tell from this post....
I write 'an hotel' but say 'a hotel'.
Thanks for putting what I was trying to say so eloquently, it is appreciated. I had a similar thread typed, but deleted it as I got fed up trying to explain what I was saying.
I didn't know about the Ylang-ylang tree, but it makes sense.
Comment