If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't get it?
Apart from the scene with the burning ship in the background, would it not cost the same to just shoot the scenes on location instead of going to the trouble of green screen technology?
I think it is about the same considering the cost of errecting an outdoor green screen, but if you were to shoot something like Ugly Betty in the street crowds would gather and gawp..you would need to seal off a fair bit of real estate to get a normal scene.....
I think it is about the same considering the cost of errecting an outdoor green screen, but if you were to shoot something like Ugly Betty in the street crowds would gather and gawp..you would need to seal off a fair bit of real estate to get a normal scene.....
Yeah i suppose so, its more about being able to shoot something relatively quickly without the usual problems associated with on-location filming.
If time is money then i can see the benefits.
Pretty amazing technology. Its now impossible to tell if something has been filmed in a studio or on location.
In 10 years time I can honestly see this sort of wizardry & CGI becoming indistinguishable from real-life scenes & actors.
Last edited by fonecrusher1; 20 February 2010, 21:55.
Comment