yobit eobot.com

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IF you had......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BioHazard View Post
    Toby 4.2's are too long ..........but could be lowered ......a 6.2 ......intresting
    yeh I know the 4.2 would be hard work to fit.... they are awesome engines though...

    but yeh the 6.2 or 6.5 Chevrolet/GMC C/K trucks engines from before '88 or something are pretty small and think they have no ecu....

    the 6.2 is not the biggest power houses though but pretty good and they sound great.. but the 6.5 is ehhhhh awesome
    One day at the time I guess..

    Comment


    • #17
      Specifications from the 6.5



      Displacement: 6.5L / 395 cu in
      Bore x Stroke: 4.06 x 3.82 (in.)
      Block / Head: Cast iron / Cast iron
      Aspiration: Turbocharged (Borg-Warner GM-X series) Also available naturally aspirated.
      Valvetrain: OHV 2-V
      Compression: GM Early 21.3:1, GM Late 20.3:1, AMG/GEP Marine 18:1
      Injection: Indirect
      Power / Torque (lowest): 180 hp (134 kW) @ 3,400 rpm / 360 lb·ft (488 N·m) @ 1,700 rpm
      Power / Torque (highest): 215 hp (160 kW) @ 3,200 rpm / 440 lb·ft (597 N·m) @ 1,800 rpm
      Max RPMs: 3,400
      Horse Power: 560
      Torque: 890
      One day at the time I guess..

      Comment


      • #18
        Hmmmmmmmm :Need a drool smilie :
        ' You've arrived on a rather special night. It's one of the master's affairs.'

        Comment


        • #19
          I am sure that would get your beast rolling well....
          One day at the time I guess..

          Comment


          • #20
            Stand by for a slobbering yeti

            http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1984-chevy-6-2...item2a0215b733

            http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1985-CHEVROLET...item1c0d706894

            Last edited by That Ruddy Squirrel; 25 October 2009, 21:34.
            Look out Eastbourne, the Pandas are coming !

            Comment


            • #21
              you buy a 6.5 reckon engine from the states for less than that though....
              One day at the time I guess..

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by BioHazard View Post
                but most are too big to fit ........... and if they do they have a ECU ....YUCK
                Briggs and Stratton are easy to work on and no ECU.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by BUSHWHACKER View Post
                  Briggs and Stratton are easy to work on and no ECU.
                  Brian

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by BUSHWHACKER View Post
                    Briggs and Stratton are easy to work on and no ECU.


                    farmer
                    ' You've arrived on a rather special night. It's one of the master's affairs.'

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by BioHazard View Post
                      Toby 4.2's are too long ..........but could be lowered ......a 6.2 ......intresting
                      Does it not also weight about a million tons?!

                      I'm not sure what engine i'd use..

                      Fine line between being a great set up.. an one thats just a lil too thirsty for normal use!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        http://www.4btswaps.com/forum/index.php

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          For me, it would have to be a flux capacitor.
                          I told the butcher I'd give him £25 if he got the meat down off the top shelf. He said he couldn't. The steaks were too high.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            V6 or V8 Jaguar engine,
                            A, they're dirt cheap
                            B, i got a mate who would help....
                            www.xjrestorations.co.uk
                            www.amcbs.webeden.co.uk www.xjrestorations.co.uk

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Having just spent parts of the kids college fund/inheritance on a new top end, im very pleased with it now...bags of torque.
                              If money was no object, and it could be made to fit..a toyota lc v8 disel...hmmmm
                              Non intercooled nothing.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by gwh200 View Post
                                If money was no object, and it could be made to fit..a toyota lc v8 disel...hmmmm
                                In a 100 series - sweeeet (because the 200 series is a pile of complex poo)

                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ydvfcyMsT4

                                http://www.australianimages.com.au/conversion/

                                I'm sure I read somewhere that this is a solid front axle too - 105 series

                                I think it would be a bit tight in a 1st gen lol
                                Another member of the 'A' team

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X