Moon landing

[GRASSMAN]

40 years commemorating the moon landing?
Is it a fake? yes, I think it is. When have the USA
ever left anything alone for 40 minuets, never mind
40 years???

Did it really happen??

Gman.

[T1z3R]

i believe in many 'conspiracy theories' but not this one. even adam and jamie think it happened

[mark g8awo]

Do some research as i cant remember where i saw it recently but the new lunar orbiter has sent back images of the remains of a LEM with tracks in the dust of the astronauts boots in the dust

[sv1000spilot]

Do some research as i cant remember where i saw it recently but the new lunar orbiter has sent back images of the remains of a LEM with tracks in the dust of the astronauts boots in the dust

Seen them, but bet the loony brigade will claim that they are fakes as well

[Vultch]

They went and as a race it was our finest hour NASA yesterday released images taken by a moon probe thats currently orbiting, they have found all but one of the landing sites and the images showed the remains of the LEM (lander) and various instruments left on the surface and what appeared to be footprints..better images to be released in the coming weeks...

[sv1000spilot]

They went and as a race it was our finest hour NASA yesterday released images taken by a moon probe thats currently orbiting, they have found all but one of the landing sites and the images showed the remains of the LEM (lander) and various instruments left on the surface and what appeared to be footprints..better images to be released in the coming weeks...

link here http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

[GRASSMAN]

OK guys,

The photo "apollo14" pic looks like the head on pint of Guinness,

From 1755ft on google earth my sons transit looks huge compared
to the lunar module.

Why do all the shadows appear to fall to the right of the LM?

Do lunar craters move about the surface?, as the largest one seems
to move about on all the pics.

When are NASA going to spell METRE correctly?

Where's HOMER? doh!!.

Gman.

PS

Why are there no stars on the colour photo of the LM?
Photo's can lie.

Gman.

[Apache]

Huh?

Are you mad?

The pic is 1755ft across, not from 1755ft up.

The craters are in different places because they are different landing sites.

The 'stars' question has been answered a million times. Contrast. The LM is very very bright in the sunlight, the stars (in comparison) are dim. Dynamic range of the film is not wide enough to capture both. Schoolboy physics.

Mind you, you could be trolling - if not very well.