Anyone has his own business on here... ?

[Chillitt]

I agree with Popeye..

[Sancho]

Well, you've made it so I'm going to end up typing more to explain now. Using exempting, it is a simple case of typing 'exempting I.E'. If I had used exception, it would have ended up being 'the exception being I.E' or 'I.E being the exception'. So, less to type.

Excepting IE would have been the same. IE excepted would have been less.

You're getting weak old man.....

[fatfires]

sh1t wonder what he thinks about my site?

[da SLUG man]

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...alidator/1.591


does it matter??

[MattF]

But now I've made you type all that out - I win!

hahahahahahaha

mwwhhahahahahahahaha

Barsteward.

[MudSurfer]

Well, you've made it so I'm going to end up typing more to explain now. Using exempting, it is a simple case of typing 'exempting I.E'. If I had used exception, it would have ended up being 'the exception being I.E' or 'I.E being the exception'. So, less to type.

But now I've made you type all that out - I win!

hahahahahahaha

mwwhhahahahahahahaha

[MattF]

It's the same number of letters (had to count it a few times to make absolutely sure)

Well, you've made it so I'm going to end up typing more to explain now. Using exempting, it is a simple case of typing 'exempting I.E'. If I had used exception, it would have ended up being 'the exception being I.E' or 'I.E being the exception'. So, less to type.

[MudSurfer]

It was less to type.

It's the same number of letters (had to count it a few times to make absolutely sure)

[MattF]

i always aggree with matt, dont want the pendandtic bugger on my arse

Coward.

[POPEYE]

I aggree with Matt! no particluar reason, i always aggree with matt, dont want the pendandtic bugger on my arse
my son's just had a look and aggrees too (he a network engineer btw and hates designing websites) it is a triffal nit picking but could give you probs on certain browers,
almost sounds like i know what i'm talking about dont it?

[MattF]

Are we substituting exception with exemption this week?

It was less to type.

[MattF]

But hey I do apologise to you....

I wasn't meaning it in any bad way or such. An apology is completely unrequired. I just tend to see a fair few sites which suffer problems due to browser incompatibility with code, or just due to generally sloppy code, so know what the visible type of effects can be. I was just trying to point out that it can have detrimental effects, nothing more. My apologies if you interpreted it as a dig or suchlike.

[MudSurfer]

Are we substituting exception with exemption this week?

[TobyJug]

as much as u are being an arse I have to admit u are 101% right..
I am sorry and will clean up my act..

It will be better now tho seen as I have my little brother now devoted to the website side of things..

And like I said before that means I can concentrate on what I am actually good at:

graphic Design, Print and Pc & Laptop repairs..

Have the workshop nearly setup and ready now....
I'll leave the websites to my professional brother....

But hey I do apologise to you....

[MattF]

but as long as it works I don't give much of a %$**%...

That is the problem, however. That is still why we have sites today that look a complete bag of sh1t or don't perform correctly in anything other than I.E. The situation should be improving, not continuing, especially when you are supposedly providing the service. You are supposed to know better than the person who hires you.