Tweet
so i sent this......
with reference to a bystander and roger fairclough (tor dec 08),well done "bystander" whoever you were/are.
firstly most vehicles had not gone round, till first vehicle was winched along aprroximately 30 feet,but as an anonymous observer your factually incorrect
observation is of no concern to me.Roger fairclough on the other hand..what can i say.i was not "leading" a group of eleven vehicles,
i was in fact round about number 9 in the 2nd group......yes second group.if he cares to read the account again,he may find that the separate groups of vehicles had no choice but to turn into a large static group,as we were in that posistion for about two hours.we are well aware that we need to travel in small groups,but when a 2 hour hold up occurs does he not think we might get ourselves jammed up.....happens on the motorways all the time.perhaps he may feel like castigating the other group coming the other way,who them selves were in small groups but because of the hold up amassed into a larger group.perhaps mr roger fairclough would care to comment,but more appropriately...but i doubt it.he seems typical of my perception of glass.on several occasions i have been encouraged to join glass to represent my views within the green lane /offroad community.i felt that that as a responsible off road driver,i didnt need to join what i felt was then,and since reading roger faircloughs reply seem certain of, is an outmoded ineffectual,organisation.in10 years of offroading,i have not seen an instance whereby glass have made a difference for me,the tro's still occur,the backbiting continues and someone like roger fairclough cannot interpret a simple deed,instead turning it in our selves.perhaps his ineffectiveness could be put to better use,get him to join the ramblers association
with reference to a bystander and roger fairclough (tor dec 08),well done "bystander" whoever you were/are.
firstly most vehicles had not gone round, till first vehicle was winched along aprroximately 30 feet,but as an anonymous observer your factually incorrect
observation is of no concern to me.Roger fairclough on the other hand..what can i say.i was not "leading" a group of eleven vehicles,
i was in fact round about number 9 in the 2nd group......yes second group.if he cares to read the account again,he may find that the separate groups of vehicles had no choice but to turn into a large static group,as we were in that posistion for about two hours.we are well aware that we need to travel in small groups,but when a 2 hour hold up occurs does he not think we might get ourselves jammed up.....happens on the motorways all the time.perhaps he may feel like castigating the other group coming the other way,who them selves were in small groups but because of the hold up amassed into a larger group.perhaps mr roger fairclough would care to comment,but more appropriately...but i doubt it.he seems typical of my perception of glass.on several occasions i have been encouraged to join glass to represent my views within the green lane /offroad community.i felt that that as a responsible off road driver,i didnt need to join what i felt was then,and since reading roger faircloughs reply seem certain of, is an outmoded ineffectual,organisation.in10 years of offroading,i have not seen an instance whereby glass have made a difference for me,the tro's still occur,the backbiting continues and someone like roger fairclough cannot interpret a simple deed,instead turning it in our selves.perhaps his ineffectiveness could be put to better use,get him to join the ramblers association
,wonder if they will print it ???
Comment