is this a 3.0l

[sledge]

http://search.autotrader.co.uk/es-uk...=&max_mileage=

looking at the engine pic it's a 2.4 engine but i might be wrong. i thought the rad cap was on the rad on a 3.0l. and the air pipes were in a diff place. on the back it says it is, so i'm wondering if it just a wrong pic thats been put up.

so what is it??????????

[Koi]

Turbo is to high up for a 3.0

[nero279]

2.4 - you wouldn't be able to see the turbo on a 3.0 as it's tucked away down the side of the block somewhere + as you say the rad cap on the 3.0 is on the top of the rad

[white akita]

that engine looks nothing like my 3ltr.

[24Seven]

I wonder if the guy knows, it says 3.0 on the back

[That Ruddy Squirrel]

If that engine is a 2.4 and it is in that car then someone needs a slap

Why do a transplant that way when everyone else is wanting to do it in reverse - ie a 3.0 Litre into a 2.4 car - Hi Sumo

[pops]

Tiz a 2.4 i had one once
and i do miss her so

[sledge]

just rung the guy and he said it's a 2l, so i think he has no idea what he's talking about so i said ok and put the phone down.

[darkdezigns]

just rung the guy and he said it's a 2l, so i think he has no idea what he's talking about so i said ok and put the phone down.

didnt know u were in the market for one??

[poppy986]

It,s a 2.4 by looks of it , but that would not match up to the M reg 1995
reg, I thought that at that year all would be a 3.0 lt engin ?


Chris

[Garygadget]

my 3 Ltr rad cap on rad

[gwh200]

oil filler cap not at the front of rocker cover,its a 2.4.
m plate should be 3.0 litre surely ??

sounds like a ringer to me

[sledge]

didnt know u were in the market for one??

yep gonna get a new one

[j.hell]

neil have a look at the internet car show room one it was on the trader for 1888 looks tatty but a bargain none the less

[sledge]

cheers j, how are you mate?